Featuring five hard drive bays by default and expandable up to 15 bays total, the DS1522+ is a compact and economical NAS solution with plenty of room to expand as the user's data storage needs grow.
#SYNOLOGY DRIVE SUPPORT SOFTWARE#
Synology's DS1522+ ships with built-in enterprise-grade data software and support for dozens of applications, OS and SaaS services. While the Synology hardware is on-par with many other NAS offerings, it's when that hardware is combined with the DSM software that Synology's offerings become best-in-class.Īlso: We test the Synology DiskStation DS1817+ RAID Closeīy far, the standout feature of any Synology NAS is the company's exceptional DiskStation Manager (DSM) software. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing.
We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. You could use them when you get a particular practical advantage from doing that, but not otherwise - you can set an expiry period for 1:1 previews after which the space is released you can set a size limit on the ACR cache and on the video preview cache yet if local storage space is really that tight, there will already be other reasons to address that root problem.ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping. Given your images are going to remain continually accessible in a NAS, smart previews are not by any means a must-have. Smart previews are designed to be much more compact than the source image but if very numerous, also a very large image library's database and previews if these are set to accumulate unrestricted, can take up significant space. This Catalog the references the source files which can live anywhere that the computer can access. That's right: the Catalog itself and its associated infrastructure (standard Library previews, and smart previews chiefly) must live, as a group, in a directly connected drive volume which can be internal or external. Within that volume you'd still need some sub-organisation but at least all items would be physically available or unavailable, backed up etc together. A single combined volume has got simplicity going for it. If the University housed all its medical publications in one branch library, and all the legal publications in another, that separation might little affect a medical student or a law student (though photos do not split quite so predictably by subject). If you stored books purely by author named A-M in one building, and N-Z in another, that would be a continual pain in the neck for library users (this could perhaps arise as an issue, with storing images separately by year). It depends on the nature of the division.
Organisationally speaking distributing source files for an image library across multiple physical volumes, whether network based or local, is no more or less awkward than when (say) a University library distributes its books across more than one physical building. Network storage may be suitable as a destination for Catalog backups but such a backup would first need to be extracted back into non-network storage before it could be used. It can reference either one or more network volumes and/or locally connected volumes without restriction. The Catalog does need to be accessed in non-network storage.
0 kommentar(er)
